Use Case #31: Full-Stack Feature
Building a complete feature from database to UI in a single development session.
William Welsh
Author
Use Case #31: Full-Stack Feature
"We need appointment reminders. Email 24 hours before, SMS 2 hours before. Track if they confirmed."
That's a full-stack feature: database, backend, workers, notifications, and UI.
The Scope
Database - Tables for reminder schedules, delivery status, user preferences.
Backend - API endpoints for scheduling, preferences, and status.
Workers - Background jobs that run on schedule, check for upcoming appointments, send notifications.
Notifications - Email and SMS delivery, templates, tracking.
UI - Preference settings, reminder history, confirmation actions.
The Session
I described the feature in plain English. Claude built it layer by layer.
Hour 1: Data Layer - Schema design, migrations, seed data for testing. RLS policies for multi-tenant safety.
Hour 2: Backend - API routes, service layer, background job definitions. Integration with SendGrid for email, Twilio for SMS.
Hour 3: Frontend - Settings page, history component, confirmation flow. Connected to backend APIs.
What Made This Possible
Supabase ecosystem. Database, auth, storage, edge functions - all in one platform. No integration overhead.
Existing patterns. The codebase had established patterns for each layer. Claude followed them.
End-to-end thinking. Not "build the backend then build the frontend." Build them together, ensuring they fit.
The Result
Feature deployed same day. First reminder sent that evening. Confirmation rate: 73% (up from 0% - we didn't have reminders before).
The Compound Effect
This feature took 3 hours. Traditional estimate: 2-3 days.
Not because the code is simpler. Because there's no context switching, no waiting for dependencies, no integration surprises.
Appointment reminders built for EDF-Pro, December 2025.
William Welsh
Building AI-powered systems and sharing what I learn along the way. Founder at Tech Integration Labs.
Related Articles
View all →Use Case #18: Competitive Research to Build
Client wanted a feature "like what Competitor X has." Claude researched X, analyzed their approach, identified weaknesses, and built something better.
Use Case #1: Autonomous Bug Fixing from Slack
One prompt. Zero babysitting. Claude read bug reports from Slack, traced the issues through my codebase, fixed them, deployed to production, and verified the fixes in a browser.
Use Case #2: Client Onboarding from URL
I gave Claude a business URL. It researched the company, scraped their content catalog, identified competitors, extracted brand colors, and generated a fully configured ContentEngine instance.